Dolores Missy Rivers
Latest filing: Q1 2026 · Apr 9, 2026 · source: Shelby County
1 of 1 expected report filed
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
Why this number?
The ending cash balance the campaign reported on its most recent filing (as filed, not computed).
- Q1 2026 Initial $1,571 filing-stated
Sum of every receipt bucket: itemized + the candidate's own money + loans + filer-stated unitemized + (federal) transfers and other receipts + in-kind.
| Itemized contributions (gross) | $2,960 |
| Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) | $1,110 |
| In-kind contributions (goods & services) | $8,532 |
| Total raised | $12,602 |
- Q1 2026 Initial $12,602 mixed
Reviewed discrepancy — this filing states $7,422 more than we could itemize.
- Itemized contributions (gross) $2,960 derived
- Unitemized contributions (filer-stated lump sum) $1,110 filing-stated
- In-kind contributions (goods & services) $8,532 derived
Itemized expenditure rows plus the stated spending a filer reported as a lump sum without itemizing it.
| Itemized expenditures | $1,389 |
| Stated spending not itemized (credited) | $8,532 |
| Total spent | $9,920 |
- Q1 2026 Initial $9,920 mixed
- Itemized expenditures $1,389 derived
- Stated spending not itemized (credited) $8,532 filing-stated
Itemized contributions from a state other than Tennessee, divided by everything the campaign raised (shown only when the state of most itemized money is known — above 99% coverage).
| From outside Tennessee | $860 |
Who funds this campaign The sources split breaks down everything the campaign raised: the candidate’s own money (including self-loans), individuals (including unitemized small gifts), organizations and PACs, and “other” (in-kind contributions, loans other than the candidate’s, and the like) — open its “Why this number?” for the full breakdown. Gift-size and location figures cover itemized contributions only. Aggregates count everyone who gave, including donors below the $200 disclosure floor — a share across all donors identifies no one. Full definition →
Individuals gave 32% of the money; organizations and PACs gave 0%; other sources made up 68%.
Why this number?
Everything the campaign raised, split into the candidate's own money (own contributions plus self- and family loans), individuals, organizations and PACs, and everything else — loans other than the candidate's, in-kind contributions, and (for federal filers) committee transfers and other receipts. Unitemized small donations count as individual money. The parts add up to the total raised. The headline share is individuals divided by the total.
| From individuals | $4,070 |
| In-kind contributions (goods & services) | $8,532 |
Gift size Each individual donor’s total giving to this campaign this cycle. Organizations, PACs, and the candidate’s own money are excluded (this is about people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. A donor named on the page can still sit in a small bucket — these are cycle totals, not “unnamed donors.” Full definition →
Why this number?
Every individual donor's total contributions to this campaign, divided by the number of individual donors. Organizations and PACs are excluded (this measures people); a donor who gave under several name spellings is counted once. The median and the gift-size buckets are computed over the same individual-donor totals. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).
| Total from individual donors | $2,960 |
| Median gift | $100 |
| Individual donors | 27 |
Where the money comes from Shares of itemized dollars, by the contributor’s state and city as filed. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it or it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into “elsewhere.” Shown only when at least 80% of dollars carry a usable state. Full definition →
71% of located dollars came from within Tennessee (29% from out of state).
- Memphis $2K58%
- Colmar, PA $2508%
- Germantown $2508%
- Olive Branch, MS $2508%
- Pacifica, CA $2007%
- Elsewhere in Tennessee $125
- Other out-of-state $160
Why this number?
Itemized contribution dollars from outside Tennessee, divided by all itemized dollars whose contributor state is known. A city is named only when at least 5 donors gave from it OR it holds at least 5% of the located dollars; everyone else is grouped into elsewhere-in-Tennessee and other-out-of-state. Shown only above 99% state coverage. Based on itemized contributions only (loans and money a filer reported as an unitemized lump sum are not included).
| From outside Tennessee | $860 |
Contributions & Spending Over Time
Itemized monetary contributions and expenditures by month — Feb 2026 – Mar 2026. Peak $1,685 in Feb 2026. Spending peaked at $856 in Feb 2026.
Contributions
Showing 9 donors who gave $200 or more cumulatively. 18 additional smaller donors contributed $1,010 total.
| Donor | Location | Employer | Total |
|---|
Expenditures
| Payee | Location | Purpose | Amount | Date |
|---|
Filing History
| Filing | Cash Beginning | Cash Ending | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | $0.00 | $1,571.17 | Source ↗ |
| Contributions: $2,960 parsed vs. $10,382 filed ($7,422 difference). Expenditures: $1,389 parsed vs. $9,920 filed ($8,532 difference). A person reviewed this filing and the gap held: the summary the candidate signed and the filing’s itemized pages disagree with each other. The source filing is linked above so you can read both. | |||